CSCI2400 Lab 6- Writing a Dynamic Storage Allocator Solution

CS2400 - Malloc Lab: Writing a Dynamic Storage Allocator
(short version)
Introduction
In this lab you will be writing a dynamic storage allocator for C programs, i.e., your own version of the malloc, free and realloc routines. You are encouraged to explore the design space creatively and implement an allocator that is correct, efficient and fast.
Logistics
Hand Out Instructions
Accept the Malloc Lab invitation from Github Classroom.
he only file you will be modifying is mm.c. The mdriver.c program is a driver program that allows you to evaluate the performance of your solution. Use the command make to generate the driver code and run it with the command ./mdriver -V. (The -V flag displays helpful summary information.)
Looking at the file mm.c you'll notice a C structure team into which you should insert the requested identifying information about the one or two individuals comprising your programming team. Do this right away so you don't forget.
How to Work on the Lab
Your dynamic storage allocator will consist of the following four functions, which are declared in mm.h and defined in mm.c.
int mm_init(void); void *mm_malloc(size_t size); void mm_free(void *ptr); void *mm_realloc(void *ptr, size_t
size); The mm.c file we have given you implements the simplest but still functionally correct malloc package that we could think of. Using this as a starting place, modify these functions (and possibly define other private static functions), so that they obey the following semantics:
mm_init: Before calling mm_malloc mm_realloc or mm_free, the application program (i.e., the trace-driven driver program that you will use to evaluate your implementation) calls mm_init to perform any necessary initializations, such as allocating the initial heap area. The return value should be -1 if there was a problem in performing the initialization, 0 otherwise.
mm_malloc: The mm_malloc routine returns a pointer to an allocated block payload of at least size bytes. The entire allocated block should lie within the heap region and should not overlap with any other allocated chunk. We will comparing your implementation to the version of malloc supplied in the standard C library (libc). Since the libc malloc always returns payload pointers that are aligned to 8 bytes, your malloc implementation should do likewise and always return 8-byte aligned pointers.
mm_free: The mm_free routine frees the block pointed to by ptr. It returns nothing. This routine is only guaranteed to work when the passed pointer (ptr) was returned by an earlier call to mm_malloc or mm_realloc and has not yet been freed.
mm_realloc: The mm_realloc routine returns a pointer to an allocated region of at least size bytes with the following constraints.
if ptr is NULL, the call is equivalent to mm_malloc(size); if size is equal to zero, the call is equivalent to mm_free(ptr);
if ptr is not NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to mm_malloc or mm_realloc. The call to mm_realloc changes the size of the memory block pointed to by ptr (the {em old block}) to size bytes and returns the address of the new block. Notice that the address of the new block might be the same as the old block, or it might be different, depending on your implementation, the amount of internal fragmentation in the old block, and the size of the realloc request. The contents of the new block are the same as those of the old ptr block, up to the minimum of the old and new sizes. Everything else is uninitialized. For example, if the old block is 8 bytes and the new block is 12 bytes, then the first 8 bytes of the new block are identical to the first 8 bytes of the old block and the last 4 bytes are uninitialized. Similarly, if the old block is 8 bytes and the new block is 4 bytes, then the contents of the new block are identical to the first 4 bytes of the old block.
These semantics match the the semantics of the corresponding libc malloc, realloc, and free routines. Type man malloc to the shell for complete documentation or just google malloc.
Heap Consistency Checker
Dynamic memory allocators are notoriously tricky beasts to program correctly and efficiently. They are difficult to program correctly because they involve a lot of untyped pointer manipulation. You will find it very helpful to write a heap checker that scans the heap and checks it for consistency.
Some examples of what a heap checker might check are: * Is every block in the free list marked as free? * Are there any contiguous free blocks that somehow escaped coalescing? * Is every free block actually in the free list? * Do the pointers in the free list point to valid free blocks? * Do any allocated blocks overlap? * Do the pointers in a heap block point to valid heap addresses?
Your heap checker will consist of the function int mm_check(void) in mm.c. It will check any invariants or consistency conditions you consider prudent. It returns a nonzero value if and only if your heap is consistent. You are not limited to the listed suggestions nor are you required to check all of them. You are encouraged to print out error messages when mm_check fails.
This consistency checker is for your own debugging during development. When you submit mm.c, make sure to remove any calls to mm_check as they will slow down your throughput.
Support Routines
The memlib.c package simulates the memory system for your dynamic memory allocator. You can invoke the following functions in memlib.c:
void *mem_sbrk(int incr):
Expands the heap by incr bytes, where incr is a positive non-zero integer and returns a generic pointer to the first byte of the newly allocated heap area. The semantics are identical to the Unix sbrk function, except that mem_sbrk accepts only a positive non-zero integer argument. void *mem_heap_lo(void): Returns a generic pointer to the first byte in the heap. void *mem_heap_hi(void): Returns a generic pointer to the last byte in the heap. size_t mem_heapsize(void): Returns the current size of the heap in bytes. size_t mem_pagesize(void): Returns the system's page size in bytes (4K on Linux systems).
The Trace-driven Driver Program
The driver program mdriver.c in the malloclab-handout.tar distribution tests your mm.c package for correctness, space utilization, and throughput. The driver program is controlled by a set of trace files that are included in the malloclab-handout.tar distribution. Each trace file contains a sequence of allocate, reallocate, and free directions that instruct the driver to call your mm_malloc, mm_realloc, and mm_free routines in some sequence. The driver and the trace files are the same ones we will use when we grade your handin mm.c file.
The driver mdriver.c accepts the following command line arguments:
-t <tracedir>: Look for the default trace files in directory tracedir instead of the default directory defined in config.h.
-f <tracefile>: Use one particular tracefile for testing instead of the default set of tracefiles.
-h: Print a summary of the command line arguments.
-l: Run and measure libc malloc in addition to the student's malloc package.
-v: Verbose output. Print a performance breakdown for each tracefile in a compact table.
-V: More verbose output. Prints additional diagnostic information as each trace file is processed. Useful during debugging for determining which trace file is causing your malloc package to fail.
Programming Rules
You should not change any of the interfaces in mm.c.
You should not invoke any memory-management related library calls or system calls. This excludes the use of malloc, calloc, free, realloc, sbrk, brk or any variants of these calls in your code.
For consistency with the libc malloc package, which returns blocks aligned on 8-byte boundaries, your allocator must always return pointers that are aligned to 8-byte boundaries. The driver will enforce this requirement for you.
Evaluation
You'll be evaluated by having a functioning malloc.
The driver program summarizes the performance of your allocator by computing a performance index, $P$, which is a weighted sum of the space utilization and throughput
$$ P = w{U} + (1-w) minleft(1, rac{T}{T_{libc}} ight) $$
where $U$ is your space utilization, $T$ is your throughput, and $T_{libc}$ is the estimated throughput of libc malloc on your system on the default traces. The value for $T_{libc}$ is a constant in the driver (600 Kops/s) that we established when we configured the program. Since we're using so many different machines, you should take this as a ``nominal'' throughput for malloc on modern-day machines. The performance index favors space utilization over throughput. default of $w = 0.6$.
Observing that both memory and CPU cycles are expensive system resources, we adopt this formula to encourage balanced optimization of both memory utilization and throughput. Ideally, the performance index will reach ( P = w + (1-w) = 1) or ( 100% ). Since each metric will contribute at most $w$ and $1-w$ to the performance index, respectively, you should not go to extremes to optimize either the memory utilization or the throughput only. To receive a good score, you must achieve a balance between utilization and throughput.
There is a scoring program, called ./grade-malloc.py that will compile your program and run the test cases. This will report a grade.
Your grade on the "does it work" portion of the machine problem is computed by the grade-malloc.py script using the reported grade.
The scoring function is based on using the https://coding.csel.io machines and specific implementations as goals:
Score of ~75% is the implementation is the book, fleshed out and implemented. This is a ``first fit'' implicit list allocator. Score ~90%, is an ``explicit'' list allocator (see 9.9.13)
Score ~100%, using ``multiple free'' lists
Score ~110%, is a ``tree based'' allocator
The scores vary based on the fit policy (first, next, best) and strategies on coalescing.
You can earn up to 10% extra credit based on the score (i.e. a maximum score of 110).
Handin Instructions
You must indicate the origin of any code your use or borrow from other people or sources. Failure to properly attribute the origin of code you retrieve from any source is grounds for receiving a zero.
Hints
Use the mdriver -f option. During initial development, using tiny trace files will simplify debugging and testing. We have included two such trace files (`short{1,2-bal.rep}) that you can use for initial debugging.
Use the mdriver -v and -V options. The -v option will give you a detailed summary for each trace file. The -V will also indicate when each trace file is read, which will help you isolate errors.
Compile with gcc -g and use a debugger. A debugger will help you isolate and identify out of bounds memory references.
Understand every line of the malloc implementation in the textbook. The textbook has a detailed example of a simple allocator based on an implicit free list. Use this is a point of departure. Don't start working on your allocator until you understand everything about the simple implicit list allocator. That's good for 70% on this assignment.
Encapsulate your pointer arithmetic in C preprocessor macros or inline functions. Pointer arithmetic in memory managers is confusing and error-prone because of all the casting that is necessary. You can reduce the complexity significantly by writing macros or, better yet, inline functions for your pointer operations. See the text for examples and look at the handout for provided samples.
Do your implementation in stages. The first 9 traces contain requests to malloc and free. The last 2 traces contain requests for realloc, malloc, and free. We recommend that you start by getting your malloc and free routines working correctly and efficiently on the first 9 traces. Only then should you turn your attention to the realloc implementation. For starters, we've built a realloc on top of
your existing malloc and free implementations. But to get really good performance, you will need to build a stand-alone realloc.
Start early It is possible to write an efficient malloc package with a few pages of code. However, we can guarantee that it will be some of the most difficult and sophisticated code you have written so far in your career. So start early, and good luck!